tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6992129293870658291.post182343763457604449..comments2009-12-08T08:15:42.122+11:00Jason Lehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13322055780076477366noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6992129293870658291.post-88166513055461780972009-12-08T08:15:42.122+11:002009-12-08T08:15:42.122+11:00Reader Lubomir wrote...<br /><br />&quot;There is a possibility to extend Siebel Object too. So you do not need to create any generic object and you can add any function directly to Siebel Objects...&quot;<br /><br />Thanks Lubomir, i hope you dont mind, but i&#39;ve decided not to disclose the technique, because modifying the Siebel objects will have unintended affects on garbage collection.Jason Lehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13322055780076477366noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6992129293870658291.post-50726939263283319632009-04-01T06:19:00.000+11:002009-04-01T06:19:00.000+11:00Good thinking outside the box. I like the work. This is exactly the kind of good community brainstorming I was hoping for when I posted that blog.<br><br>On the downside, you won&#39;t be able to call custom methods directly from non-application objects (think, QueryWithSearchExpr() called from a buscomp server script on itself), which may not even turn out to be all that useful anyways. And on the upside, you&#39;ve done away with the dangerous side-effects of extending the Object class.<br><br>Good stuff.Mike M. Linhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15777749776576992680noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6992129293870658291.post-69115610027246514062009-03-25T04:13:00.000+11:002009-03-25T04:13:00.000+11:00Gr8 job JASON!! ... i didn&#39;t have time to work on it ... your work will definitely help!!TJhttp://siebel.co.nrnoreply@blogger.com